By now, I am sure that you have heard of the tragic hate crime that took place in February. The one where two black men allegedly poured gasoline on a 13 year old white boy and lit him on fire. Oh, you haven't heard that yet? I wonder why? Is that because the racist media will only push stories that forward their agenda.
I am sure you have heard about the Trayvon Martin case, which is tragedy, because a young boy is dead. However, the liberal media is pushing this as a racist crime. Why, because George Zimmerman's skin is lighter than Trayvon Martin? The only person that knows if the death of Trayvon Martin was racially motivated is George Zimmerman.
However, in February, the same month as the Martin death, an alleged hate crime took place in Kansas City. A 13 year old boy was walking home from school, when he was allegedly approached by two older teens, who held him down, doused him in gasoline, and lit him on fire. The assailants were described to the police as black teens. Further reports state that one of the suspects said, "You get what you deserve, white boy." Now obviously, these are allegations and are yet to be proven true, but it has the appearance of a hate crime and I haven't heard one thing about it from MSNBC, CNBC, Racheal Maddow, Chris Matthews, etc. I have not heard the President state, "If I had a son, he would look like the alleged assailant."
Now I realize that these specific cases are not the same, as one ended in the death of a child. However, the point is that the media and apparently the President will use race issues for political gain. Not to mention the Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons of the world who are simply race baiters. I agree that there are certainly race issues in this country, but the issues are on an individual basis and not rooted in society, as the liberal media would like for you to believe.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Free Stuff or Hard Work?
Mitt Romney had a marquis campaign moment during a rally at Bradley University on Tuesday. When a female heckler in the crowd stated, , “So you’re all for like, yay, freedom and all this stuff and like pursuit of happiness. You know what would make me happy? Free birth control.”
Unscripted, Romney fired back, “If you’re looking, if you’re looking for free stuff, if you’re looking for free stuff you don’t have to pay for, vote for the other guy. That’s what he’s all about, okay? That’s not what I’m about.”
A great moment by Romney basically summed up what the 2012 Presidential election as all about - The handouts vs.the hard workers. President Obama has created an attitude of entitlements and freebies. On the other hand, Governor Romney believes in hard work and merit. Judging by his statement, he won't give you things for free, but hopefully he can create jobs, which the President hasn't, so people who choose to work can earn money to buy things they need and want.
So, let's just hope in 2012 there are more hardworking voters than freeloading ones.
Unscripted, Romney fired back, “If you’re looking, if you’re looking for free stuff, if you’re looking for free stuff you don’t have to pay for, vote for the other guy. That’s what he’s all about, okay? That’s not what I’m about.”
A great moment by Romney basically summed up what the 2012 Presidential election as all about - The handouts vs.the hard workers. President Obama has created an attitude of entitlements and freebies. On the other hand, Governor Romney believes in hard work and merit. Judging by his statement, he won't give you things for free, but hopefully he can create jobs, which the President hasn't, so people who choose to work can earn money to buy things they need and want.
So, let's just hope in 2012 there are more hardworking voters than freeloading ones.
Thursday, March 15, 2012
No Christmas, No Valentine's Day, Now No St.Patrick's Day
Sorry Lucky, you are not wanted in Wilbrham! |
Governor Patrick hates Christmas and all things Christian, Certain Newton schools do not like candy at Valentine's Day, and now school administrators in Wilbraham are anti-St. Patrick's Day. But not to worry, they are encouraging the students to celebrate O'Green Day at school tomorrow.
As far as I know, I have not a drop of Irish ancestry in me, but I love St. Patrick's Day. The food, parades, basketball tournament, and of course the Jameson and Guinness. its more of an American holiday as opposed to an Irish holiday, so why the worry about political correctness. Probably because many liberal lefties in Western Massachussets do not even like America in my opinion.
The Soule School is apparently worried about its political correctness and is therefore celebrating O'Green Day to get in the spirit of the holidays.
The station reports the school principal, Lisa Curtin, reportedly made the move to be “inclusive and diverse” and ease any discomfort that may go along with celebrating St. Patrick’s Day. A similar renaming was done on St. Valentine's Day, also out of consideration of what are termed "faith issues," abc40 reports.
Since the Commonwealth is basically trying to get rid of all holidays that have any Christian overtone whatsoever, I have come up with a few more they should start banning:
President's Day - This should be banned in the Commonwealth because George W. Bush was a President. And of course it is his fault that we have $4 a gallon gas prices and 9% unemployment. Since he was a President, then obviously President's Day shouldn't be celebrated.
July 4th - We should have this banned because it is obviously insensitive to those who do not know how to count. how are they supposed to even know what day to celebrate on? Its simply not a fair holiday for all.
Labor Day - How many people actually work in Massachusetts? Because the state like to set up so many people in "free" housing and EBT cards, only the people who work would actually celebrate Labor Day. Therefore a holiday named labor Day is insensitive who those who sit at home and live off the system. Well, I guess they do have to work to go get their EBT card reloaded.
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Will Hollywood help America?
The liberal elitist Hollywood types such as Brad, Angelina and George Clooney will usually jump at the chance to humanitarian efforts and help those in need. Well, they will usually help those in Haiti, Japan, and other foreign countries. But will they help Americans in need? That remains to be seen.
The central and Southern regions of our country have been devastated by tornadoes this week, leaving a path of death and destruction.
Many Americans are facing a long recovery process from these natural disasters. They need help. They need money, medical care, and other support as they try and rebuild their lives in the wake of unthinkable despair.
Who is going to stand up and help these people? Will you Mr. President? Will you give them as much money as you give to foreign countries in need of aid. Will you Mr. Kayne West? Or do you only have benefit concerts for Haiti and other countries to boost your international image? Will there be TV commercials giving people a number to text $10 to help Americans in need? I do not know the answer to these questions, but I plan to send a donation, and I hope others will as well.
I do not expect the elitist Hollywood left to care because after all, these are Americans in need, and not Haitians. By Brad and Angelina (or their Hollywood colleagues) raising money for Americans, their international image may take a hit, and that would be devastating.
The central and Southern regions of our country have been devastated by tornadoes this week, leaving a path of death and destruction.
Many Americans are facing a long recovery process from these natural disasters. They need help. They need money, medical care, and other support as they try and rebuild their lives in the wake of unthinkable despair.
Who is going to stand up and help these people? Will you Mr. President? Will you give them as much money as you give to foreign countries in need of aid. Will you Mr. Kayne West? Or do you only have benefit concerts for Haiti and other countries to boost your international image? Will there be TV commercials giving people a number to text $10 to help Americans in need? I do not know the answer to these questions, but I plan to send a donation, and I hope others will as well.
I do not expect the elitist Hollywood left to care because after all, these are Americans in need, and not Haitians. By Brad and Angelina (or their Hollywood colleagues) raising money for Americans, their international image may take a hit, and that would be devastating.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)